Meta is $6,000 above the approved budget
- Why it matters
- Spend could run against a plan the client has replaced.
- Source
- Budget revision 3 and the live platform allocation
- Owner
- Media lead
Waiting on a decision.
Worked example · sample data
Budget revision 3 moved money between channels. The account total still matches, so a check of the total finds nothing. A line-by-line check finds three items for your team to decide.
Step 1: The check
This is a read-only check. It reads the approved plan and the platform allocations, and changes nothing.
| Channel | Approved (revision 3) | Live allocation | Difference | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meta | $42,000 | $48,000 | +$6,000 | Flagged |
| Google Search | $30,000 | $30,000 | $0 | Matches |
| YouTube | $18,000 | $12,000 | −$6,000 | Flagged |
| Programmatic display | $25,000 | $25,000 | $0 | Matches |
| Total | $115,000 | $115,000 | $0 | Matches |
The same run compares the display invoice of $26,250 with its $25,000 insertion order, which adds the third flag.
Step 2: The decision
Try it. Choose a decision for each flag and watch the record update.
3 flags still open
Waiting on a decision.
Waiting on a decision.
Waiting on a decision.
An illustration using invented figures, not a client result or a finished product screen. Your version would appear in the tools your team already uses.
In a 14-day sprint
Your workflow may be different. The same pattern applies to briefs, scope, production checks, and onboarding.
Try it on your own work
Tell us what has to match, and where it lives today.
Show us the handoff that keeps slipping